ZachXBT Criticizes Zora Content Coins, Calling Them ‘Viral’ But Financially Hollow

Crypto investigator ZachXBT has publicly criticized the financial performance of Zora content coins, labeling them as merely “viral.” 

His comments come in response to a celebratory post by Jesse Pollak, Head of Base and Coinbase Wallet, who highlighted Zora’s record-breaking engagement metrics.

ZachXBT Challenges the Financial Value of Zora Content Coins 

In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Pollak shared a chart illustrating a dramatic spike in daily Zora transacting users, peaking at 290,300.

Sponsored

Sponsored

“Coins going viral on 4/20 is wild,” he wrote.

According to data from Dune Analytics, the network has seen a significant increase in activity. So far, 528,084 coins have been created on Zora. This has generated a total volume of $179 million. 

This increase in activity is further emphasized by the fact that over 20,000 new tokens are being created daily. This steady creation of new tokens reflects the platform’s growing popularity and expanding user base.

However, ZachXBT challenged the narrative, pointing out the lack of financial growth of the content coins.

“All of these ‘viral’ coins yet not even a single $5 million+ runner,” he said.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Yet, Pollak argued that the value of content in the crypto space cannot be measured solely by large financial gains.

“This mindset is part of the problem, and I’m surprised to see you champion it,” he replied.

Pollak also questioned the value of ZachXBT’s content. He explained that most content holds little immediate value, with only a small portion reaching meaningful financial outcomes.

“Ask yourself this: how often do you think Instagram or TikTok generates enough revenue from a single piece of content attention to generate a $5m valuation?” he noted.

Furthermore, the executive emphasized that the space is still in its early stages, and everything is dependent on increased creativity coming on-chain.

Nonetheless, ZachXBT countered. He asserted that the space has already reached mainstream attention and that treating it as “day one” contributes to stalled progress.

He also warned that the false marketing of creator coins as being fundamentally different from micro-cap meme coins could be damaging, highlighting the potential risks of overhyping these projects without clear, sustainable value.

“You do understand when you say “generate a $5m valuation” that is nowhere near the amount that’s actually liquid? Top creators on social media platforms will earn five figures or more per promotional post and viral videos. you yourself agree most content is worth zero so why would any reasonable creator want to dilute their brand by flooding it with many creator coins,” ZachXBT remarked.

In his response, Pollak defended the concept of on-chain content creation, comparing it to creators on Web2 platforms. According to him, in both cases, the content creation process does not “dilute” or reduce the value or integrity of the creator’s brand or reputation. He stressed that the market and algorithms will naturally separate successful content from the rest. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

Notably, last week, Base’s official X account created a token on Zora called “Base is for everyone.” However, the move attracted substantial backlash after the token plummeted shortly after launching. Some users accused Base of orchestrating a “pump and dump.” 

Despite this, Pollak continues to maintain his supportive stance.

“We started coining Base’s content because we believe that unlocking coins to be used for more use cases is a key next unlock for the onchain economy and a powerful tool for helping creators earn from their creativity,” Pollak’s post read.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Meanwhile, the debate comes as Zora approaches its highly anticipated airdrop. As BeInCrypto reported, the platform will distribute 10% of ZORA’s total supply to early users tomorrow. Additionally, Binance Alpha will list ZORA on the same day, further increasing the token’s visibility and accessibility.