Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter and Block, returns to the center of the debate on the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto: a recent investigation by the crypto-analyst Seán Murray lines up a series of technical and temporal elements that revive the hypothesis.
What clues connect Jack Dorsey to the creation of Bitcoin?
According to the latest analysis conducted by Seán Murray, there are several surprising indicators that associate Jack Dorsey with the genesis of Bitcoin:
- Dorsey used C++ from the mid-Nineties, precisely the language in which the Bitcoin source code was originally written, creating a significant technical connection.
- Active presence in the cypherpunk community and early commitment to cryptography. Already in the ’90s, Dorsey shared content on digital security and privacy, directly connected with personalities like Hal Finney and Adam Back, known pioneers of Bitcoin.
- Chronological coincidences: Satoshi’s registration on the forums (November 19) coincides with Dorsey’s birthday, while the first Bitcoin transaction to Finney dates back to January 11, the date of Dorsey’s mother’s birthday.
- California IP trace in 2009: in that year both Satoshi and Dorsey were in California according to a specific analysis.
- Wallet “1JaK”, considered by Murray a direct reference to the name “Jack”.
All these elements, although circumstantial, are seen by Murray as a chain of coincidences too precise to be ignored.
“`html
THE NEWEST WHY JACK DORSEY IS SATOSHI NAKAMOTO
C++ for Bitcoin source code
Now confirmed Jack coded in C++ as far back as mid-90sC in the White Paper
Now confirmed Jack coded in C as far back as mid-90s.Satoshi pseudonym
“Satoshi” was the first tweet Jack’s best friend…— Seán Murray (@financeguy74) August 2, 2025
“`
What do the testimonies and official documents say about Dorsey and Bitcoin?
In his investigative work, Seán Murray also references documented facts and official statements. In particular, he cites Block’s SEC filing (2024) which states that the company itself “is following Satoshi Nakamoto’s blueprint.” According to the analyst, this deliberately cryptic wording would be an encrypted message and self-referential note placed by Dorsey, who has led Block since 2009.
Furthermore, it was found that during the crucial years of Bitcoin’s development, Dorsey was consistently involved in cypherpunk discussions, both on mailing lists and early social channels. He shared relevant materials regarding decentralization, digital cash, digital sovereignty, anticipating many concepts that later became pillars of Bitcoin.
How much does Dorsey’s silence weigh on his alleged origins as Satoshi?
While on one hand Jack Dorsey has never publicly claimed to have created Bitcoin, on the other hand Murray highlights his low profile and the consistency of the ideals expressed over the years. Unlike other candidates who have denied or have been disproven, Dorsey has always promoted privacy and decentralization, staying in line with the original philosophy of Bitcoin.
This confidentiality would be, according to the analyst, perfectly consistent with Satoshi Nakamoto’s style: few messages, targeted interventions, and no search for personal notoriety. Furthermore, the absence of a clear denial regarding theories like this keeps the suspicion alive in the community.
Why key dates matter: the puzzle of temporal details
The details on the dates highlighted by Murray play a crucial role in this theory. Not only the coincidences related to the birthdays of Dorsey and his mother with the key moments in the launch of Bitcoin, but also the timeline of activity on forums, mailing lists, and blockchain transactions appears to overlap with Dorsey’s public agenda in the same years.
It is worth noting that the theory finds further resonance in the geographical presence: the IP californiano di Satoshi emerges from the archives of the very first Bitcoin network.
What would be the impact if Dorsey turned out to be Satoshi Nakamoto?
A confirmation would lead to profound changes both in the way the market views Bitcoin and in the narrative of decentralized technology. In addition to rewriting the historiography of the blockchain, new interpretations would open up regarding Dorsey‘s role in the movements for digital freedom and on the very design of Bitcoin as an asset and as an ideology.
The credibility of Murray’s theory is also reinforced by the fact that Dorsey, compared to many alleged Satoshis, has demonstrable technical credentials and a documentable personal history in the sector, in addition to the current influence exerted through Block and the DeFi ecosystem.
An official revelation would impact the entire structure of meme coin, on institutional capital inflows, and on public perception regarding the security and independence of Bitcoin from big tech.
What do we really know: is it just a theory?
As of today, Seán Murray’s theory remains without definitive proof. All the reported facts are clues linked together from public sources, historical records, and behavioral patterns. There are still no incontrovertible confirmations about the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, but this new piece fuels the myth and the global debate.
For those who operate in the crypto sector, staying updated on these discussions remains essential, also because every element related to the origin of Bitcoin can generate strong market fluctuations and reactions from the community.
What changes now and what to expect in the future
The Dorsey-Satoshi hypothesis opens unprecedented scenarios: from the rewriting of an epochal story to the possibility that central figures of Silicon Valley have secretly led the financial revolution of the last two decades. Beyond the circumstantial evidence, the future depends on the publication of new data and, perhaps, on a possible official statement.
And you? Do you closely follow these tracks and the latest theories on Bitcoin, because every detail could make the difference and change the narrative of cryptocurrencies forever.