JPMorgan froze stablecoin startup accounts over compliance risks, highlighting growing pressure on banks as regulations tighten across global crypto markets.
JPMorgan has frozen banking accounts linked to several stablecoin startups in recent months. The action shows increased compliance pressure on the banks dealing with crypto transactions. Moreover, the move makes obvious risks associated with high-risk jurisdictions. As a consequence, there is now more stringent banking scrutiny of stablecoin firms.
JPMorgan Freezes Accounts Over Compliance and Sanctions Exposure
The Information reported that JPMorgan froze accounts that were associated with Blindpay and Kontigo. Both firms were operating in high-risk markets, one of them being Venezuela. According to the report, sanctions exposure elicited serious concerns. Therefore, the bank moved to protect itself from the regulatory risk.
The Information reports that JPMorgan has frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups operating in high-risk markets such as Venezuela in recent months. The move underscores the compliance risks banks face from crypto transactions, including stringent…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 27, 2025
JPMorgan identified action in sanctioned or high-risk jurisdictions as a major issue. Venezuela continues to be under a large number of international sanctions. As a result, transactions related to such regions activate increased compliance reviews. Banks need to sidestep the threats of violations to preserve license.
Another concern was a lack of identity verification practices. One firm was reported to have permitted transactions without full identification of the customer. This is antithetical to Know Your Customer requirements. As a result, it increased Anti-Money Laundering compliance risks for the bank.
Related Reading: JPMorgan Ventures Into Crypto Trading to Expand Wall Street Access | Live Bitcoin News
The report also stated a huge increase in chargebacks from new customers. Chargebacks are frequently the indicators of fraud or weaknesses in the verification process. Therefore, JPMorgan saw this trend as a warning sign. Such patterns can drive up operational and reputational risk.
JPMorgan stressed the decision was not anti-stablecoin. A spokesperson said the bank’s ongoing support of business compliant with stablecoins. Recently, JPMorgan even helped go public with a stablecoin firm. However, specific violation caused action in these cases.
Blindpay was one of the listed startups that were affected by the report. The company specializes in payments of stablecoins in emerging markets. While growth was rapid, there were reported lagging controls on compliance. This imbalance probably made JPMorgan’s response to it.
Regulatory Pressure Intensifies for Stablecoins and Banks
Stablecoins are working in a quickly evolving regulatory landscape. Banks that do business with these firms need to comply with stringent oversight standards. Therefore, compliance failures among the clients directly affect banking partners. This dynamic makes rising caution behaviour across the sector.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing rules continue to be key requirements. Transactions must be monitored and screened against sanctions lists by banks. Stablecoin companies that do not implement these controls are introducing a high level of risk. As a result, banks might limit exposure.
Transparency requirements also apply to stablecoin issuers. Many jurisdictions require one-to-one reserve support. Further, issuers are required to publish regular audits or attestations. These measures are taken to ensure the safety of users as well as financial stability.
Data sharing obligations also make compliance difficult. Enforcement of the Travel Rule is done by the Financial Action Task Force. This is a rule provided that requires sender and recipient data to be shared for big transactions. Stablecoin platforms are required to develop systems to support such disclosures.
In July 2025, the United States approved the GENIUS Act. The law provided a federal framework for stablecoins. It requires stringent reserve, redemption and compliance standards. Issuers must comply with these rules in order to operate legally.
The GENIUS Act brought more clarity and also a greater expectation for enforcement. Banks now have clearer guidelines with which to on-board stablecoin clients. As a result there has been considerably less tolerance for compliance gaps. This shift has implications for startups who are trying to access traditional banking.
JPMorgan’s moves point to wider industry wariness. As regulations develop, banks might further restrict exposure to high-risk crypto activity. Ultimately, compliance readiness is going to determine which stablecoin firms will survive and scale.