Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of BitMEX, recently sparked a discussion with his tweet dated January 22, 2024, questioning why Bitcoin (BTC) and the S&P 500 Index (SPX) have stopped moving in tandem since the U.S. BTC ETF launch. His inquiry points to a deeper analysis of market dynamics, liquidity concerns, and future predictions for these asset classes.
Decoupling of BTC and SPX
Hayes’ tweet highlights a notable shift in the correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500, a trend that was evident post the launch of the U.S. Bitcoin ETF. Traditionally, BTC and SPX showed some degree of correlation, often moving together in response to global economic trends and liquidity influxes. However, Hayes points out this parallel movement has ceased, raising questions about the underlying reasons and their implications.
Bitcoin ETF: A Turning Point
The launch of the U.S. Bitcoin ETF marked a significant milestone in the crypto world, offering a bridge between traditional finance and digital assets. While this development was anticipated to bring in more liquidity and stability to Bitcoin, it seems to have altered its behavior in relation to traditional stock markets. The divergence could indicate a change in investor perception or a shift in the asset’s fundamental characteristics.
Liquidity Concerns and Future Predictions
Hayes speculates that Bitcoin’s current movement might signal upcoming challenges in liquidity (denoted as “$ liq” in his tweet). Liquidity is crucial for the smooth functioning of markets and asset price stability. If Bitcoin is indeed hinting at liquidity issues, it could have broader implications for both crypto and traditional financial markets.
The mention of the January 31st U.S. Treasury refunding announcement in Hayes’ tweet suggests that he is connecting these liquidity concerns to upcoming economic policy decisions. This event could be a crucial indicator of future market movements and investor sentiment.
The Existential Risks of Bitcoin ETFs
Hayes, in a blog post dated December 22, 2023, delved into the potential dangers a spot Bitcoin ETF poses to Bitcoin’s existence. He argued that Bitcoin, unlike traditional monetary assets like gold or fiat currency, requires active movement within its network for its sustenance. He raised concerns about large traditional finance (TradFi) asset managers like Blackrock, entering the Bitcoin space. These entities, known for accumulating and storing assets without active usage, could inadvertently lead to Bitcoin’s network collapse due to lack of movement, especially post-2140 when Bitcoin block rewards hit zero.
Impact on the Global Financial System
In an essay from January 15, 2024, Hayes highlighted the necessity of keeping capital within the financial system to manage unproductive debt. He pointed out Bitcoin’s minimal correlation with bonds and warned of the risks if bond vigilantes were to favor cryptocurrencies over government bonds. Hayes emphasized the importance of financializing Bitcoin through a spot ETF, akin to the gold market, to keep the capital within the system and avert a global financial crisis.
Broader Market Impact
Hayes’ observations invite a broader analysis of market dynamics. If Bitcoin is diverging from traditional market indicators like the SPX, it could mean a shift in how investors are viewing cryptocurrencies. This decoupling might reflect Bitcoin’s maturation as an independent asset class or highlight its sensitivity to different market forces compared to traditional assets.
Image source: Shutterstock