Dogecoin Will Rally 15% If This Pattern Plays Out Correctly


article image

Arman Shirinyan

Track live crypto price of 10000+ coins!


Dogecoin may be eligible for a rally if the popular chart pattern ends up being bullish

The first memecoin on the cryptocurrency market, Dogecoin, has a hint for intraday traders thanks to the symmetrical triangle pattern, which may launch DOGE forward if it plays out in favor of bulls.

Traders usually consider a symmetrical triangle a bullish pattern as it statistically results in an upward breakout. But at the same time, traders should not forget about the possibility of a bearish scenario in which an asset breaks the lower border of a pattern and speeds downward.

Dogecoin Chart
Source: TradingView

Unfortunately, DOGE is more actively testing the lower border of the formation, hinting at a plunge down rather than a short-term upward rally.

Long-term Dogecoin scenario

Because of the current sentiment on the cryptocurrency market and a massive outflow of funds from it, it is hard to predict any positive outcome for the memecurrency, which had lost more than 50% of its value in a matter of days.

Since the all-time high, Dogecoin has lost almost 90% of its value, becoming one of the worst performing assets on the cryptocurrency market despite a massive correction on other assets.

According to IntoTheBlock, Dogecoin’s profitability remains above 50%, which is considered a balanced value for a digital asset. Whenever the profitability of a digital asset drops below 30%, traders consider an asset oversold, and the opposite rule is applied whenever the asset’s profitability spikes above 70%.

While Dogecoin mostly follows most cryptocurrencies on the market, it often rallies without the support of Bitcoin or any other major assets, as its moves are often speculative and supported by news like Tesla accepting DOGE payments, or Elon Musk calling it the cryptocurrency of the future.


Download MAXBIT Android App, Your best source of all crypto news!

Google Play

Source link

Share this article: