- Judge Motha criticizes SARB for using apartheid-era crypto laws.
- Court urges urgent legal reform to address digital asset regulation.
- South Africa risks falling behind amid booming global Bitcoin interest.
In a significant court ruling, a South African High Court judge criticized the country’s central bank for relying on outdated crypto laws to regulate the sector. Judge Mandlenkosi Motha pointed out that the SARB was not using current regulations when handling digital assets like Bitcoin, because it is still sticking to old exchange control guidelines meant for apartheid. These were said during a conflict between Standard Bank and a firm that did not repay its debt of R41 million.
Judge Calls for Legal Reform in Crypto Regulation
The case was initiated because Standard Bank was trying to liquidate a company for not paying its debts. But the company’s assets were seized by SARB’s Financial Surveillance Department (FinSurv) before the liquidation could begin. As described by FinSurv, the company bought significant quantities of Bitcoin and transferred them to overseas cryptocurrency exchanges. They claimed that the action broke South Africa’s exchange control laws.
Even so, James Ewing & Sons was taken to court by Standard Bank. According to FinSurv, people argued that the rules were outdated and did not directly address digital assets. Accordingly, Judge Motha said that the existing laws aren’t sufficient for cryptocurrencies. He pointed out that our existing laws call for treating digital assets such as Bitcoin as if they were different from traditional money.
The judge also stated that cryptocurrencies should not be treated the same as physical money. For instance, people use global electronic ledgers to store them, which makes it harder to follow them to a specific location. This leads to questions beyond the law: Should travelers mention their cryptocurrencies when they go across borders? Can people use them the same way as cash when depositing? To the judge, these questions point out how current exchange regulations have severe limitations.
Moreover, Judge Motha turned to an academic paper given by SARB, which labeled cryptocurrencies as only digital codes. Because of this, they are not associated with one country like national currencies are. Therefore, he said it was necessary to interpret what “currency” means according to present laws to conclude if a company complied with exchange control regulations. The expert emphasized that the law should be changed to fit the special features of digital assets.
Bitcoin Boom Reveals South Africa Legal Gaps in Crypto Regulation
Meanwhile, digital asset platform Luno has raised concerns about the same issues. Luno, which started in South Africa, has frequently called for straightforward and up-to-date regulations. They say that because of the uncertainty around regulations, investors are likely to invest less in the sector. Bitcoin’s value being above R2 million demonstrates the huge level of interest around these assets. With global firms and pension funds making crypto investments, South Africa may fall behind.
Importantly, since digital assets have not clearly been set apart as being onshore or offshore in South Africa, there is a gap in the law. Because it is unclear how to treat offshore assets, investing organizations find it challenging to handle them. Therefore, many investors are wary of entering the crypto world because of uncertainty over regulations.
Overall, the judge’s ruling has highlighted the need for South Africa to update its rules governing cryptocurrencies. It is obvious that recent developments in finance call for updates in the legal system. With changes in these laws, South Africa can ensure investors are protected, stop exploitation, and encourage the economy to grow from digital advances.
The post South African Judge Slams Outdated Crypto Laws appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.