Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin admires Grok because it makes X more truth-friendly and notes that this is a net improvement despite the well-known limitations and biases of the AI chatbot.
Vitalik Buterin commended the AI chatbot Grok, created by X, and called it a significant truth increase on the platform. He pointed out that the feature of Grok that matters the most is ease of summoning it.
On X, Buterin explains that Grok is the greatest positive force of truth following Community Notes. The value of it lies in its unpredictability; the users do not know how the AI will respond to their questions.
The easy ability to call @grok on twitter is probably the biggest thing after community notes that has been positive for the truth-friendliness of this platform.
The fact that you don’t see ahead of time how grok will respond is key here – I’ve seen many situations where someone…
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) December 25, 2025
Source: Vitalik.eth
When Grok Destroys Political Bias
Buterin observed a notable trend on the platform: people tend to ask Grok to verify some drastic political opinions, but the AI tends to be wrong.
I have witnessed lots of instances when the users want Grok to validate their radical views, but Buterin wrote on X. Grok is providing the other side of the argument and essentially breaking the echo chambers.
The founder pointed out that Grok has a net positive effect but also raised valid concerns. The fine-tuning methods bring up the issue of bias infiltration possibility.
You might also like: Chainlink Reserve Holdings Surpass 1.32 Million LINK
The Dark Side of Centralized AI
Grok had some shortcomings that came out in recent events. The chatbot was exaggerating the sporting skills of Musk and even claimed he could come back to life quicker than Jesus Christ.
Elon Musk attributed these hallucinations to adversarial prompting. Crypto executives highlighted more underlying issues in centralized AI systems and promoted decentralized alternatives to provide accuracy.
The main problem, as pointed out by Kyle Okamoto of Aethir, is that in the case where a single company possesses a powerful AI system, it may experience algorithmic bias, and this bias may become institutionalized over time.
According to Okamoto, models form worldviews, priorities, and responses that seem objective. Discrimination may change to scaled-up logic.
The spread of misinformation is quick, as AI tools are used by more than one billion people. ChatGPT has been criticized due to biased answers and factual inaccuracies, whereas Character.ai has been accused of malicious relationships with minors.
Buterin still considers Grok better than other alternatives on X. He feels that it is more effective than third-party content in seeking truths, and the interplay with the ecosystem of X has special benefits.
The debates around AI governance are ongoing in the industry. The issues of centralized control versus decentralized models are controversial. The performance of Grok on X gives actual, real-life data on both sides.