Wintermute opposes AAVE’s governance proposal over unclear value capture and governance concerns, signaling a divide in the DeFi community.
Wintermute founder Evgeny Gaevoy has announced that the firm will vote against the current AAVE governance proposal. The proposal, which seeks to transfer brand asset control to AAVE token holders, raises concerns about unclear value capture and governance mechanisms.
As an active participant in Aave’s governance and a significant investor in the AAVE token, Wintermute’s stance has drawn attention within the DeFi community. The firm’s opposition highlights ongoing tensions over how the protocol should manage and allocate its value.
Wintermute’s Concerns Over the AAVE Proposal
The main concern Wintermute has with the AAVE proposal is the lack of operational clarity. Gaevoy questioned how the transfer of brand control would work in practice.
He pointed out that the proposal did not specify who would manage the brand or how it would be monetized. This uncertainty around the operational details made Wintermute uncomfortable supporting the proposal.
⏰What happened in Crypto in the last ~48h:
– Wintermute will against $AAVE forum proposal
– Maple Finance issued its largest loan ever, $500MM
– Binance will support the Frex Share($FXS) Mainnet Swap and Rebranding to Frax($FRAX)
– Kraken Plans to Launch Prediction Markets in… pic.twitter.com/8lLQBE14nw— Layergg (@layerggofficial) December 26, 2025
Additionally, Gaevoy highlighted the misalignment between Aave Labs and a significant portion of AAVE token holders. The disagreement centers around who should benefit from the protocol’s generated value.
Gaevoy believes that this disconnect could negatively impact the growth of the token, especially if the issues remain unresolved. He argued that Aave Labs and the token holders must reach an agreement on these fundamental matters.
Political Maneuvering and Market Sentiment
Gaevoy also criticized the political maneuvering surrounding the vote. He pointed out that the public escalation of the situation has harmed AAVE’s market price. According to Gaevoy, the conflict and criticism have created unnecessary volatility and uncertainty.
The governance process, he suggested, should focus on solving core issues rather than fueling divisiveness.
While he acknowledged communication shortcomings from Aave founder Stani Kulechov, Gaevoy felt that the backlash against him was excessive. He noted that such public attacks were detrimental to the token’s value.
Gaevoy emphasized that the governance process should not rush decisions without clear execution details, as this could have long-term negative effects on the token’s market stability.
Related Reading: Wintermute Accused of Manipulating Market by Dumping $BTC and $ETH
Wintermute’s Voting Decision and Aave’s Future
Wintermute has confirmed that it will vote against the proposal due to the unclear value capture mechanism and governance concerns.
However, Gaevoy stressed that Wintermute still believes in the potential of AAVE and expects Aave Labs to address these issues in the future. He encouraged the team to engage in deeper discussions on the long-term solutions for token value capture.
The voting outcome will likely have significant implications for the future of Aave’s governance structure. A rejection of the proposal could lead to more open discussions about how to resolve the current issues.
On the other hand, if the proposal passes, it could further deepen the divide between Aave Labs and the token holders, delaying any potential resolution of the value capture challenges. The DeFi community will be watching closely as the situation unfolds.